Saturday, February 29, 2020
Analysis of theoretical approaches to speech perception
Analysis of theoretical approaches to speech perception Speech perception is vital to language used in day to day lives. When someone speaks, the air pressure fluctuates and the waves strike the ears and in some way the individual turns these sound waves into meaningful consideration what the speaker is saying about. So, speech perception is important for human communication (Smith 2007). The core concept in speech perception is to explain the mechanism of perceiving the words correctly despite of inconsistent information provided by speech signals. It can be understood by the fact that human can perceive as many as fifty phonemes per second in a language in which the individual is fluent. This suggests that speech is perceived with marked rapidity. On contrary when the individual is not fluent in a particular language (e.g. foreign language) can perceive only about two third of single phone per second (of non speech sound) (Sternberg 2009:351). Over the last five decades researcher in the field of speech perception focused more attentio n on establishing the relationship between the properties of acoustic signal and linguistic components (phonemes and distinctive features). This has turned out the result to be more complex, and still how human perceive speech is not ascertain. Thus, this extensive research for explanation has given rise to important theoretical perspective on speech perception (ncbi 2009). The purpose of this essay is to critically evaluate various theoretical approaches toward speech perception. The most influential theories of speech perception include Motor theory, Cohort theory, and TRACE model (Eysenck 1995:280). First the essay will scrutinize the main claims proposed by motor theory; then it will examine the critique of cohort theory and finally analyze the TRACE model. A conclusion can be drawn that among all of these above mentioned theories cohort theory is better, scientific, and there is good evidence which suggests rationale justification of speech perception (moodle.coventry.ac.uk n.d .). The motor theory was the first and the most influential theory of speech perception proposed by Liberman et al. (1967). This theory is based on the following assumptions: Speech perception is perception of the articulatory gestures. ââ¬ËPhenomenon of speech perception as specialââ¬â¢ (Sternberg 2009:352). Involvement of the motor system in perception of the speech (ncbi 2009). Speech perception is perception of articulatory phonetic gestures. ââ¬ËListeners engage in a certain amount of mimicking of articulatory movements of the speakerââ¬â¢ (Eysenck 1995: 280). This is a controversial claim of the motor theory of speech perception, it state that the phonetic gestures produced in the air are not the objects of speech perception; instead the gestures of the vocal tract of the speaker are the real objects of speech perception (ncbi 2009). The evidence which supports this claim that the object of speech perception is gestural and not acoustic is the finding that ââ¬Ët he hand motor system to be activated by linguistic tasks, most notably pure linguistic perception but not by auditory or visuospatial processingââ¬â¢ (ebscohost 2003) ââ¬ËPhenomenon of speech perception as specialââ¬â¢ (Sternberg, P.352): It is difficult to evaluate this claim because the term ââ¬Ëspecialââ¬â¢ in itself is ambiguous. At least three possibilities can be drawn by the term ââ¬Ëspecialââ¬â¢ as speech perception is special with respect to audition or speech perception is special with respect to audition that mean application of motor system in speech perception or speech is produced and process by a special neural track (ncbi 2009). There are no sufficient evidence available to support this claim so, should probably be retarded (talkingbrains 2008).
Thursday, February 13, 2020
Business Organization And Policy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words
Business Organization And Policy - Essay Example This essya stresses that as the implementation is going on, the performance should be measured and evaluated to ensure no deviations from the plan. If there are any deviations, the plans are modified to ensure the right path is taken. Due to continuous changes in the environment SWOT analysis is conducted so as to respond to the changes. This involves analysing the strengths and weaknesses of the organization as well as opportunities available in external environment and potential threats. This leads to the start of the planning process. This paper makes a conclusion that rapidly changing business environment forces organizations to engage in continuous planning process. Analysing the internal and external environment is essential as it enables the organization to change its structures and strategies to enable quick response to the changes. The business planning process enables the firm to set a roadmap to follow by determining the nature of the business, the product offerings, nature of competition, legal requirements and location of the business. Policies are formulated to enable the business to accomplish its objectives hence the overall business mission but control and evaluation is required to ensure activities are going according to the plan. Locating an organization in a concentrated area allows it to enjoy external economies such as; skilled labour, improved distribution channels, services and amenities, specialization, use of by-products, support from larger companies and shared technology.
Saturday, February 1, 2020
Organisation Design &Organisation Development Assignment
Organisation Design &Organisation Development - Assignment Example Organisation development dwells more on ensuring that people achieve effectiveness for an organisation to achieve its overall success. Organisation problems can be a set of challenges that hinder an organisation from working at maximum efficiency. The problems could be resulting from poor leadership, which affects the structure of an organisation or the systems established within the same. W.L Gore Associates is a company within the textile industry that applies a unique leadership format. The company does not have a hierarchical system of leadership, which is an ancient command and control system. The challenge that this brings is that there is familiarity when it comes to leadership and team members are allowed to act as they will. Based on this, this essay will focus on this problem and use the functional structure and the classical organization theories in addressing the same. Gore Associates believe in having a horizontal leadership structure in which all employees are equal and do not have to be answerable to anyone. The flat leadership also allows for an inclusive decision-making process where team members have to be consulted before making important decision making (Ruairc, Ottesen, & Precey 2013, p. 116). The companyââ¬â¢s CEO also focuses more on being friendly to the employees rather than on getting the job done. The company also works under the assumption that the employees hired are aware of their responsibilities, meaning that supervision should not be a key practice. Employees have the autonomy of planning their work schedules as long as they get the work done, which at times can be chaotic. Essentially, there is no system of operation that employees have to follow meaning that everyone is their boss (Obolensky 2014, p. 72). When it comes to the CEO, the employees get to choose who should be in charge,
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)